If you would only buy a specific version, then obviously each model must be a different putter.Ĭircling back to the address schemes, you have five choices there. Do you buy blind? If you are arguing that these are all the same, then you shouldn’t have a problem with getting one at random. Would you buy one sight-unseen for $300 like you would when buying packs of Pokemon cards? If these putters came in sealed packs, you’d have a one-in-10 chance of getting your desired alignment and neck. Still not convinced? Think about this scenario. The 2-Ball Triple Track Ten and the Triple Track Ten are not either. The 2-Ball Ten and the 2-Ball Ten S are not the same putters. For me, changing the not at all subtle alignment scheme changes the performance of the putter, just like changing the neck from a double-bend spud to a slant neck. I’d probably agree with you if I had not rolled all of these in person. I get your argument that it is one putter with five different alignment options. OK, this is where some of you are going to be annoyed that I am calling this a “line” of putters. Speaking of alignment… Odyssey Ten: Five Alignment Options These Tens are more compact, a bit boxier and have much straighter edges, a feature that Odyssey touts as alignment improving. Odyssey has also reduced the hourglass/black widow mark shape of the original Ten. These Odyssey Tens are solidly hole free. Gone are the potentially distracting holes in the head. The hidden weighting tech housed in the chamber on the sole is largely unchanged but the body has morphed. The 2021 Odyssey Ten heads have undergone some remodeling. Obviously, you keep an insert like that around. On the other hand, Odyssey believes the Microhinge Star to be their best-performing insert, so why abandon it? This insert is also very popular on Tour, likely because it features the firmest feel and promotes the most top spin. On one hand, this is not surprising as Odyssey has spent a great deal of time and money developing Microhinge Star. These new putters all feature the Microhinge Star insert. Some of you were not that keen on the old-school White Hot insert replacing the new-school Microhinge Star insert. “Better performing” is a phrase we are hearing again and again with the Odyssey Ten line. More importantly, Odyssey says it is better performing. This version of the shaft is stiffer and lighter than the previous Stroke Lab shaft. As I mentioned, the updated version of the Odyssey Stroke Lab shaft will be the stock shaft. While the White Hot OG line was all retro all the time, the Odyssey Ten putters feature the highest of high tech. Could this version of the 2-Ball really be better than all others? How confident are they in this line? Odyssey’s Luke Williams calls the 2-Ball Ten “the greatest 2-Ball ever.”Įver? Think about what has been accomplished with the 2-Ball since its inception 20 years ago. From the shaft to the insert, the face to the weighting, Odyssey has loaded these putters with all of the modern elements that they believe make for better putting. This new Odyssey Ten line should remove all doubts about Odyssey’s continued commitment to advancing putter technology. And, remember, that shaft is optional for White Hot OG putters. That was understandable as the updated Stroke Lab shaft was the only modern Odyssey advance featured in the White Hot OG line. Some voiced concerns that Odyssey was abandoning their modern putter advances. About a month ago, Odyssey Golf announced the return of the beloved White Hot insert in the unapologetically retro White Hot OG putter line.

The script definitely has been flipped with the release of the new Odyssey Ten putter line. In stores March 11 with a MSRP of $299.99.Five different alignment schemes and slant necks available.Odyssey releases 10 versions of their popular Ten putter.

Odyssey putter